Of course, by unicorns I mean tech “start-ups” with $1 billion-plus valuations. Fortune’s cover story entitled “The Age of Unicorns“provides a handy list of such unicorns and this nifty graphic. You will see a few enterprise examples sprinkled in:
Why all the Unicorn talk?
Wikipedia defines zeitgeist, as “the intellectual fashion or dominant school of thought that typifies and influences the culture of a particular period in time”. That is such a perfect description of the unicorn phenomenon. Through a confluence of events, including:
- social, mobile, local
- low interest rates
- cheap cloud infrastructure
- huge VC inflows
- few alternative investment opportunities
it is a great time to be a tech start-up and to chase the unicorn dream.
The unicorn concept is top-of-mind also because it is important in the VC community. As Peter Thiel points out in his excellent book Zero to One, unicorns are the stuff of which venture funds are made: “The biggest secret in venture capital is that the best investment in a successful fund equals or outperforms the entire rest of the fund combined.” (His emphasis, not mine.) So if you own a portfolio of companies, you better have a bunch that have the potential to become unicorns!
As an Operator, Don’t Let Unicorn Talk Distract You
However, if you are an entrepreneur in an enterprise tech start-up you do not want to spend time thinking about unicorns. There are many reasons for this (mainly statistical improbability), which can be found in the best article about unicorns , written by the lady who seems to have coined the phrase. I’ll highlight just a few:
- Unicorns are rare, enterprise unicorns even rarer (see the article or graphic above). Most unicorn definitions include a “time-to-$1-billion” limit, which is shorter than the time enterprise start-ups take to become established. (I’m guessing, for instance, Inovalon (INVO) is not on anyone’s unicorn list, even though it just went public with a market cap of $3.3 billion.)
- The concept of a unicorn is one-sided. It is only about valuation, not invested capital. I learned in my first week at BCG more than 30 years ago, that the notion of valuation is useless without considering the associated capital required to achieve said valuation. (Investing $500 million to get a $1 billion valuation 7 years later equates to a 10% annualized return, about the same as the stock market with less risk.) The good news is that many enterprise start-ups require much less capital than B2C start-ups to achieve sizeable valuations.
- Valuations are fickle. There are many former unicorns no one mentions these days. I worked at Ariba while it was valued at $40 Billion, $600 million, and on its way back to being sold for $4.5 billion. One of our founders, Keith Krach, (who is Chairman of unicorn (DocuSign) and former Chairman of former unicorn Angie’s List) used to wisely say: “ARBA (the stock symbol) is not Ariba.” He meant we should stay focused on building the business, not the valuation.
There has never been a better time to start an enterprise software company and dream of unicorns. (It’s like Florence must have been during the Renaissance.) But if you are an operator, don’t let the existence of unicorns bedazzle you and cloud your judgment–other than to accept as much capital as you can get at these valuations! Build your business to provide the best possible return on capital. Let your VC worry about whether their portfolio has future unicorns in it. And hope that they do, as it will make your life easier. 😉